Show Sidebar Log in
Academic Commons
  • Home
  • About
  • Blogs
  • Groups
  • People
  • Badge Library
  • Group Request
  • Site Request
  • Help
  • GGC Login
  • External Login

Group Admins

  • Profile picture of tgluick

FLC DWF Rates in Chemistry

Public Group active 6 years, 8 months ago

Several interventions have been applied to decrease the DFW rates in introductory chemistry courses during the past five years. Even though higher student success rates were observed, the DFW rates remain at the same level. Recently it has been noted that a disproportionate amount (approximately half) of the DFW rates is due to student withdrawals. Additionally, data on students who repeat courses indicates that students who have withdrawn from a course once are far more likely to withdraw from a course on their second attempt compared to their peers who received Ds or Fs on their first attempt. To investigate the possible reasons leading to the DFWs, with a particular focus on student withdrawals, we propose to form a faculty learning community composed of members from chemistry discipline, library, and CTE. We plan to 1) develop proper interview/questionnaire protocol, 2) interview students who withdraw from introductory chemistry classes, and 3) compile a list of reasons for withdrawals. Based on the collected data, we would like to recommend practical interventions that can be adopted by the chemistry discipline to decrease DFW rates and improve retentions. Our faculty learning community will not only provide opportunities for members from different areas to collaborate with each other but also serve as a model for future investigation of DFW rates in other disciplines in SST, and potentially across the college.

FLC Meeting minutes 1/26/2018

Tagged: Meeting Minutes

  • This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 7 years, 3 months ago by Ying Guo.
Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • January 30, 2018 at 11:15 am #5327
    Ying Guo
    Participant

    Members Present

    Dr. Chantelle Anfuso
    Dr. Thomas Gluick ( Co-Chair, Secretary)
    Dr. Ying Guo ( Co-Chair, Presiding)
    Adrienne Harmer, MLS
    Dr. Michael Kirberger
    Dr. Kevin O’Halloran
    Dr. Mai Yin Tsoi

    Members Absent

    Dr. Rebecca Eaker

    Dr Ying Guo opened the meeting at 3:15 PM

    Dr Guo reported upon meetings with Dean Mundie (attended by Dr. Guo); Dr. Latanya Hammonds-Odie and Dr. Charmita Burch( attended by Drs Guo and Gluick), and Dr. Rebecca Eaker( attended by Drs Guo and Gluick) that were strongly encouraged by the NSF and USG Funded STEM CURE Mini-Grant Program Committee.

    Dean Mundie: (RPG STEM group): Once we have defined questions we want to address, he can help us review the specific data available.

    Dr. Latanya Hammonds-Odie and Dr. Charmita Burch: They have been studying the withdrawals in Biol1107&1108, Chem1211&1212 since 2013. The response rate for their data collecting surveys from students who withdrew during the past three years was very low even with incentives. They also suggested resources to help us design our survey.

    Dr. Rebecca Eaker(Assistant Professor Psychology): during our meeting was interested in joining the FLC; she will provide an initial draft of interview questions within the next two weeks; she also offered to train any members who are interested in interviewing students. One member asked about Dr. Eaker’s affiliation and her expertise; the chairs answer the question.

    Copies of the proposal were passed to the members. We discussed various aspects of the proposal including methods to identify students at risk to withdraw, discussed various strategies to deal with the data, to use Tirza Leader to vet questions in interview or survey, and other issues concerning methodology. Generally described as a brainstorming session.

    We assigned tasks based on the objectives listed in the proposal.

    Obj 1: gather DFW data from other USG and private institutions to determine whether the rate is pervasive or just specific to GGC or school with similar demographics

    Drs O’Halloran and Kirberger volunteered to complete this task.

    Ms. Adrienne Harmer mentioned that the 12 schools in Georgia are available.

    Obj 2: We decided that this is a low priority since Hammonds-Burch reported the data is scant.

    Discussion followed on how we may remedy this situation for the future; including mandatory responses to a questionnaire before withdrawal from class is granted.

    Obj 3: Determine whether different teaching methods are independent of the DF or W rate.

    Discussion followed as whether this was a worthwhile goal to pursue; discussion revolved around the role of quantitative data when using mixed methods.

    Drs. Gluick and Guo decided to take on this task.

    Obj 4: Institute a method or methods of recording student reasons for withdrawing from CHEM 1211K and CHEM 1212K

    Some discussion of this objective followed.

    Dr. Anfuso, Dr, Eaker, Dr. Tsoi and Ms. Harmer volunteered for this task.

    Obj 5: Compile an annotated bibliography on STEM retention efforts.

    Dr. Gluick discussed one reason why this is a goal; Ms. Harmer added that searching for this information ought not to be a difficult task.

    Dr. Anfuso and Ms. Harmer volunteered to complete this task.

    Obj 6: too premature to assign this task.

    During the meeting we had a discussion concerning how to collect preliminary data to better design our interview or survey questions. Dr. Tsoi thought focus groups would be ideal with the exception that the IRB would not approve the request. Drs. Anfuso and Gluick, expressed sentiments that well thought out survey questions may accomplish the same thing or that preliminary interviews conducted this semester might serve the same role as a focus group. This issue is left unresolved.

    We agreed to move the target date for IRB approval to March 3rd, which is a change from what is stated in the proposal. Approval for the IRB may allow us to conduct preliminary interviews this semester. This also sets the deadline for the interview or survey questions to be done before this date.

    We discussed various strategies to deal with handling student data. Dr. Anfuso suggested that we use OneDrive instead of Drop Box when handling student data. We informally agreed to use One Drive to store data. Dr. Gluick or Dr Guo will have to set this up.

    Dr. Gluick will talk to Judy about training members need to complete for collecting data and doing interviews. Dr. Gluick will report back by the next meeting.

    We agreed to increase the meeting frequency to biweekly.
    We agreed to meet at 3:00 PM?
    We agreed to meet Feb 9th.
    The meeting was adjourned around 4:40 PM.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In
Group logo of FLC DWF Rates in Chemistry
  • Forum
  • Activity
  • Announcements
  • Blog
  • Docs
  • Members 8

Who’s Online

There are no users currently online

Members

Newest | Active | Popular
  • Profile picture of ebizontek
    ebizontek
    Active 1 month, 1 week ago
  • Profile picture of jdelaney
    jdelaney
    Active 2 months, 2 weeks ago
  • Profile picture of rkalman
    rkalman
    Active 2 months, 2 weeks ago
  • Profile picture of cwalker23@ggc.edu
    cwalker23@ggc.edu
    Active 3 months, 1 week ago
  • Profile picture of admin
    admin
    Active 3 months, 1 week ago

Groups

Newest | Active | Popular | Alphabetical
  • Group logo of Chemistry
    Chemistry
    Active 2 years, 11 months ago
  • Group logo of Environmental Science
    Environmental Science
    Active 4 years, 3 months ago
  • Group logo of Peer Supplemental Instruction (PSI)
    Peer Supplemental Instruction (PSI)
    Active 5 years, 2 months ago
  • Group logo of Digital Learning Community
    Digital Learning Community
    Active 5 years, 2 months ago
  • Group logo of GGC Bird Lab
    GGC Bird Lab
    Active 5 years, 8 months ago

Groups

Newest | Active | Popular | Alphabetical
  • Group logo of Active Learning
    Active Learning
    95 members
  • Group logo of STEM Education Innovations VCoP
    STEM Education Innovations VCoP
    53 members
  • Group logo of Digital Learning Community
    Digital Learning Community
    45 members
  • Group logo of Specifications Grading Group
    Specifications Grading Group
    20 members
  • Group logo of Game Based Learning
    Game Based Learning
    17 members

Groups

Newest | Active | Popular | Alphabetical
  • Group logo of Active Learning
    Active Learning
    95 members
  • Group logo of STEM Education Innovations VCoP
    STEM Education Innovations VCoP
    53 members
  • Group logo of Digital Learning Community
    Digital Learning Community
    45 members
  • Group logo of Specifications Grading Group
    Specifications Grading Group
    20 members
  • Group logo of Game Based Learning
    Game Based Learning
    17 members

Contact Us

Put your contact information in this widget.

About

Some brief information about your site.

Sitemap

  • About GGC’s Academic Commons
  • Assertion Page
  • Badge List
  • Badge Page
  • Contact
  • Evidence Page
  • Groups
  • Home Page
  • Issuer Page
  • Members
  • Site Tracking
  • Site-Wide Activity
  • Slider
The GGC Academic Commons is a service provided by the Center for Teaching Excellence in collaboration with the Office of Educational Technology.
Skip to toolbar
  • About WordPress
    • About WordPress
    • Get Involved
    • WordPress.org
    • Documentation
    • Learn WordPress
    • Support
    • Feedback
  • Log In